Contents

Business / B2B PR
Client / Agency Management
Consumer / B2C PR
Corporate PR
Corporate Social Responsibility
Corporate / exec reputation
Crisis & Issues
Internal management of PR
Measurement, Research & Monitoring
Media relations
Reports / research / studies
Social media / Online & search

Subscribe
‘PR Influences’ is free and content can always be accessed through this site. However, if when we publish a new article, or any new content, you would like to be alerted to its availability by email alert click here to register. Note: when you register we ask for the minimum of information (0nly a name and an email address).

Your Comments

Comments and dialogue is always welcome. You can comment direct to the Editor, Grant Common . click here.

 
Top >>

Clients and their agencies give perspective on PR priorities

Published 2004

US corporations and their agencies both appear to agree that agencies should be providing more strategic advice - and after publicity and media relations, corporations say that help with positioning and messaging is what they value most from external agencies.

These are some of the findings from a major survey undertaken during May 2004 of PR agencies and their clients in the United States.

The survey was conducted on behalf of US-based PR News by the Counsellors Academy, a group within the Public Relations Society of America that represents PR agencies.

Strategy v tactical

While US corporations appear to be using their agencies more for tactical implementation work, both they and their agencies believe that strategic work should be lifted to be the predominant role.

Corporations believe that currently between 60 and 90% of the work their agencies do for them is tactical or implementation.

  • 27% believe that 70% of their agencies work is tactical
  • 17% believe that 80% of their agencies work is tactical
  • 15% believe that 60% of their agencies work is tactical

But when asked what it ideally should be:

  • 38% thought it should be 50% strategic and 50% tactical
  • 22% thought it should be 60% strategic and 40% tactical

Agencies believe that the amount of tactical work is more in the region of 50% to 70%.

  • 29% believe that 50% of the work they do is tactical
  • 17% believe that 70% of the work they do is tactical
  • 16% believe that 40% of the work they do is tactical

But when asked what is should ideally be:

  •  40% believe it should be 70% strategic and 30% tactical
  • 20% believe it should be 50% strategic and 50% tactical

Importance of agency services

The services corporations said they valued most from their agencies were, in order of importance:

  • publicity and media relations   
  •  messaging assistance
  • positioning assistance
  • issues management
  • crisis communications
  • creative services (design/production of materials)

When agencies were asked which services they considered should be the most important to corporate clients four outranked all others:

  • positioning assistance
  • messaging assistance
  • publicity and media relations
  • issues management 

How to improve relationships

The three actions corporations thought agencies should do were:

  • make more effort to learn and understand their interests
  • measure results in a more meaningful way  
  • improve  our organisation’s visibility and awareness    

The three actions agencies thought clients should do were:

  • provide larger, more realistic budgets
  • provide better access to upper-level executives
  • set clearer expectations for the measurement of results

Measurement of communications

Asked which methods they used to measure their communications program, corporation respondents ranked the options as follows:

  • quality of publicity placements
  • brand message delivery
  • target audience reached v total audience
  • advertising equivalencies
  • reputation assessments
  • behaviour or attitude change measurement through formal research
  • sales
  • leads generated and closed

How best to bill

A fixed monthly fee or a retainer is the preferred method of remuneration of both parties.

Corporate    

  • 43% prefer a monthly fee or retainer
  • 32% prefer to work on a project basis
  • 13% prefer to work on an hourly charge basis

Agency      

  • 51% prefer a monthly monthly fee or retainer
  • 23% prefer to work on an hourly charge basis
  • 9% prefer to work on a fixed fee plus an hourly basis for extra work

Footnote:

Note: The author of this article is a senior Sydney based independent corporate PR consultant with 30 years PR agency experience who works with PR Managers to help them get the most out of their relationships with PR agencies, as well as helping them review and select PR agencies. He also advises, coaches and mentors PR Managers and undertakes audits of PR Department structures and programs. He blogs regularly on PR communications topics similar to those in this article.

You may have an interest in, or obtain value from, these blogs:

1) How stronger management is the key to better PR agency relationships

2) How better briefs and RFP's contribute to improved PR outcomes

3) How Australian PR agency selection processes are changing

 

 

 

About 'PR Influences'
'PR Influences' is a free Australian-domiciled information resource which contains a decade of archived articles, insights and tips relating to most aspects of external communication or public relations. These are complemented by fresh articles which are published regularly.

'PR Influences' is researched, written and published by Grant Common, a 30 year PR veteran who consults to PR Managers on PR departmental effectiveness and PR agency relations and selection.

If you want to be alerted by email to new articles or content on PR Influences when they are published, please click here

For those with a specific interest in staying abreast of current news, trends and commentary around the issues and challenges facing PR Manager.s including PR departmental effectiveness, and managing and selecting PR agencies, visit Grant's blog.


Subscribe - About Us - Legal - Contact Us - Home


Copyright PR Acumen Pty Ltd
P.O. Box H303, Australia Square NSW 1215 AUSTRALIA
E: info@pracumen.com.au W: www.pracumen.com.au

PR Influences Australia:Advice from of PR agencies valued. PR consultants, Sydney - author



e-Brochure for Download

Download Grant Common and PR Acumen e-Brochure

Sounding board for PR Managers
Are you a PR Manager looking for an independent, senior 'sounding board' to help you get the best out of your PR Department and/or PR Agency? ...more

Need to audit or review your PR program?
Are you a PR Manager who needs one-off help to audit, review or develop your PR program , or  help on 'selling' PR to the CEO? ...more

Need One-off Corporate PR & Communications Support?
Does your organisation need one-off specialist corporate PR and communications advice because of issues or changes that are likely to impact on stakeholders? ...more

Getting the best out of your PR agency?
As a PR Manager do you believe you are getting the best out of your PR agency? ...more