Top >>
Clients and their agencies give perspective on PR priorities
Published 2004
US corporations and their agencies both appear to agree that agencies should be providing more strategic advice - and after publicity and media relations, corporations say that help with positioning and messaging is what they value most from external agencies.
These are some of the findings from a major survey undertaken during May 2004 of PR agencies and their clients in the United States.
The survey was conducted on behalf of US-based PR News by the Counsellors Academy, a group within the Public Relations Society of America that represents PR agencies.
Strategy v tactical
While US corporations appear to be using their agencies more for tactical implementation work, both they and their agencies believe that strategic work should be lifted to be the predominant role.
Corporations believe that currently between 60 and 90% of the work their agencies do for them is tactical or implementation.
-
27% believe that 70% of their agencies work is tactical
-
17% believe that 80% of their agencies work is tactical
-
15% believe that 60% of their agencies work is tactical
But when asked what it ideally should be:
Agencies believe that the amount of tactical work is more in the region of 50% to 70%.
-
29% believe that 50% of the work they do is tactical
-
17% believe that 70% of the work they do is tactical
-
16% believe that 40% of the work they do is tactical
But when asked what is should ideally be:
Importance of agency services
The services corporations said they valued most from their agencies were, in order of importance:
When agencies were asked which services they considered should be the most important to corporate clients four outranked all others:
How to improve relationships
The three actions corporations thought agencies should do were:
-
make more effort to learn and understand their interests
-
measure results in a more meaningful way
-
improve our organisation’s visibility and awareness
The three actions agencies thought clients should do were:
-
provide larger, more realistic budgets
-
provide better access to upper-level executives
-
set clearer expectations for the measurement of results
Measurement of communications
Asked which methods they used to measure their communications program, corporation respondents ranked the options as follows:
-
quality of publicity placements
-
brand message delivery
-
target audience reached v total audience
-
advertising equivalencies
-
reputation assessments
-
behaviour or attitude change measurement through formal research
-
sales
-
leads generated and closed
How best to bill
A fixed monthly fee or a retainer is the preferred method of remuneration of both parties.
Corporate
- 43% prefer a monthly fee or retainer
- 32% prefer to work on a project basis
- 13% prefer to work on an hourly charge basis
Agency
-
51% prefer a monthly monthly fee or retainer
-
23% prefer to work on an hourly charge basis
-
9% prefer to work on a fixed fee plus an hourly basis for extra work
Footnote:
Note: The author of this article is a senior Sydney based independent corporate PR consultant with 30 years PR agency experience who works with PR Managers to help them get the most out of their relationships with PR agencies, as well as helping them review and select PR agencies. He also advises, coaches and mentors PR Managers and undertakes audits of PR Department structures and programs. He blogs regularly on PR communications topics similar to those in this article.
You may have an interest in, or obtain value from, these blogs:
1) How stronger management is the key to better PR agency relationships
2) How better briefs and RFP's contribute to improved PR outcomes
3) How Australian PR agency selection processes are changing
|